reported profiling in the observability stack
The CNCF annual survey highlighted profiling as an emerging observability practice.
CNCF Annual Cloud Native Survey · 2026 ↗Updated 2026-10-04 · Software delivery
A source-first view of change quality, recovery speed and whether the running system meets its objectives. Published findings provide context; the measurement framework shows what to calculate inside your own environment.
01 / Published evidence
Each figure links directly to the organization that published it. Vendor telemetry and community surveys are labelled rather than blended into one invented industry average.
The CNCF annual survey highlighted profiling as an emerging observability practice.
CNCF Annual Cloud Native Survey · 2026 ↗DORA combined this survey with more than 100 hours of qualitative research.
DORA 2025 report announcement · 2025 ↗CNCF described cloud-native adoption as near-universal among surveyed organizations.
CNCF Annual Cloud Native Survey · 2026 ↗02 / Your baseline
Use these formulas consistently for at least one complete operating cycle. Keep scope, exclusions and collection dates beside the result.
Changes causing rollback, hotfix or incident ÷ all changes × 100
Median time from impact detection to service restoration
Measurement windows meeting the agreed SLO ÷ all windows × 100
03 / Interpretation
Segment results by environment, workload owner and business criticality. A falling average can hide one critical service getting worse; a rising count can simply reflect better discovery.
Related benchmarks
Gritt can map the data sources, calculate a defensible baseline and implement the changes behind it.
Build the baseline →